Metacognition Week: Computer-Assisted

11-2-03
What I know about a book includes physical and visual cues. Where on the page an idea appears. A feel for approximately how many pages there are in one hand and in the other hand if I am holding the book open with both. Things I remember later so I can find my way back to an idea with a minimum of effort. And then there are my own marks, stars and boxes, hatches and underlines of varying weights for subtle cues, all of which I have perfected over time. To read without these, even if the reading is enriched by links and commentary, is reading handicapped. These are not the aesthetic luxuries some writers go on about in New Yorker essays, not the usual “writing just isn’t the same without the $100 fountain pen!” wimpery — these are genuine holes in a system of organizing knowledge. Computer text-provision systems need to take into account that people accustomed to reading books have methods like these, and should provide similar resources.

I don’t know if the next generation of computer users will have the same needs — maybe they will have other ways of managing knowledge. And surely everyone’s methods are different, so systems should be flexible.

* * *

1/25/04
New strategy this semester: in reading materials on the computer, I am using Word’s text highlighting and “comment” abilities. Of course I hate relying on the Evil Empire, but these functions have a relatively simple interface, and I have high hopes that the highlighting will help cue me to remember which parts of an e-text are important better than leaving a blank text behind. I like that the comments pop up when you mouse over; it’s almost as good as having margins. However, there are still questions about whether underlining and highlighting help me at all! I have found that margin comments help — I have near-photographic memory, over the course of a few days at least, of where on a bicameral page I have left a star or note. And of course, this is something that is not too doable on a scrolling page of text; so much for that tool…

Keep CBS From Censoring MoveOn's Ad

Though enough money has been raised to get Super Bowl airtime for MoveOn.org’s ad about the debt the Bush Administration will pass on to future generations,, CBS is refusing to air the ad. It’s a shame — it really is a simple ad which I think would appeal to people of many political and apolitical persuasions. You can sign a petition to CBS about it. An ad from PETA is also facing censorship, and it even includes naked ladies! During the Super Bowl, can you imagine?

Metacognition Week: Study Strategies

Yes, this is a Thing — this week I am gonna post every day, because I have a lot of stuff that I never quite finished last semester. And most of it fits together! Probably I should save it up and mete it out over the semester, so I don’t have eons of dead air and lose you all to Marlys Magazine (on which Lynda Barry is posting her own comics now instead of just Salon, since I don’t know when? With some frequency!) but I hate having a backlog of unfinished ideas — tends to put a damper on new developments. So enjoy Metacognition Week — the theme week which is probably misnamed, since I don’t know much about cognitive science yet!

* * *

The Hamster Technique

Last semester I developed a new technique for writing response papers. I call it the Hamster Technique.

The first paper I wrote using the Hamster Technique was for a professor who I loved dearly, but happened to give the class a prompt that was so full of faulty assumptions that I had to completely disassemble it in order to begin to talk about the reading in question. That’s the Hamster Technique: chew the topic into tiny pieces and make a nest out of it. I felt scandalously irreverant doing it. The professor wasn’t insulted, though; he ate it up. So I kept doing it.

I rather like this technique. I don’t quite understand why I never did it at Hampshire. My guess is because I got to define most of my paper topics myself, and so often professors had few guiding comments before the writing or after that I never had to pick anything apart. I swear to god, faculty input at Hampshire was often about as pressureful as hippie toilet training.

* * *
A Person Outside of Homework

Last semester I started to realize how useful the past four years were in thinking of myself as a Person Outside of Homework. I didn’t come up with that conception of myself until I started practicing not doing my homework intentionally, just to see what it felt like.

It was really good to not have homework. Until I stopped having homework I was unable to distinguish between the impact of factors like “organization” and “tiredness” and “intellectual boredom” and “distractions” on my performance. There was me not doing all my homework and thus being a bad person, and then there was me doing my homework and being a good person.

This was highly detrimental to my sense of well-being. Frequently there was some amount of reading I left undone; as it built up, I felt like a worse and worse person. By the end of Hampshire I was convinced I’d never amount to anything academically. I was still caught up in the nagging idea I used to have that everything a teacher assigned must be indispensable to my understanding of her field, because obviously she was an expert in it, right?

* * *
Your Own Personal Syllabus

Apologies, this part of the post is being temporarily suppressed for political reasons. Please look for it later!

Metacognition Week: Reading

written 12/28/03 — “this semester” is Fall ’03
Earlier this semester, in trying to explain myself and my goals to a professor, I wrote something about books being my friends and instantly knew it was a lie calculated to impress him. The truth is that books used to be my friends. Now I’m scared of them, even hate some of them, and have spent time over the past few years avoiding them.

There’s a lot of reasons, but conditioning is foremost. I almost want to say, How could anyone come from a high-pressure academic background and not hate books?, but I know a lot of people who don’t think that way. In my case I know it’s had a bad effect, though. I was the kid who routinely maxed out her library card in elementary school. When school started enforcing ways to read, what I read, and how I needed to respond to it, I lost the joy of reading. The books I read in school are neurotic bristles of underlining and marginal notes. No, that’s not true. Starting in high school, when a teacher told me I was a good writer, novels and poetry have joyous marginal notes, and were deconstructed with relish. I think the joy returned as I regained a sense that I would join these people and write books someday myself; reading was part of a community of developing meaning, and I loved that.

The real neurosis set in with analysis and memorization of facts. I learned to read to find what someone else wanted me to find in the text. I was never really sure I was doing it right when I was reading literature, though there was more room for me to develop my own meaning there.

History readings were a real problem. Whole pages of my old history books are highlighted or underlined solid. Classmates used to look with concern on my books, asking me what the hell I was trying to do. I think I was trying to underline the important parts. But unless I was writing research papers, and until I started having teachers who taught social history, the idea of what was important was completely external to me. I underlined what I thought I was supposed to memorize for tests, and I had a very hard time distinguishing which parts might be important to the teacher. None of it was important to me. I can’t even begin to identify all of the bad habits of thought and organization this fostered.

Different teachers had different suggestions and demands for how you organized knowledge. Some of them wanted you to keep journals; in junior high, the age when diaries were a popular phenomenon, the idea of what you might put in a journal was conflicted and tinged with a sense of invasion of privacy.

Dr. Feldmeth in high school wanted us to keep notes on our history readings and lectures, and then turn them in. Looking at this practice as a teacher, it sounds like great pedagogy – it gives you a sense of how the kid is using distributed intelligence, is perhaps a more accurate “understanding performance” than a high-pressure test, and allows you room to correct areas where a student is misconceiving of the ideas presented.

As a student, though, understanding why this man wanted to see your notes was a matter of black-boxing. I’m not sure if he explained the educational goals of turning in notebooks. They seemed pretty arbitrary to me at the time; I think I resisted the activity. If he did explain it, I guess the explanation must not have made sense.

It was only this semester – my first semester of graduate school, at the age of 26 — that I developed a method of reading which has started to make sense. I’ve thrown any sense of underlining for “what’s important” to the winds. A lot of the stuff I’ve been reading this semester has seemed obvious to me, and so what I underline ends up being ideas which are striking or new, instead. I’m still fine-tuning this strategy; I’m not even sure that it works. Dana was telling us that we should be keeping notes to… what was it, defend our dissertation, or was it to help build a literature review? See, I don’t even know which questions I want to answer yet, so that’s likely to leave me with as few useful notes as my high school strategy… man… I’m going to get myself voted “Most Likely To Go ABD” any day now…

Our Best Chance To Make The TeeVee Say "Drop Bush, Not Bombs!"

If you haven’t already gone over to MoveOn.org’s Bush in 30 Seconds site, you should do so. MoveOn fielded these ads from the public, held a vote on which were the best, and they’re amassing funding to run these ads in swing states. This is one of the best activist uses of media I’ve seen in a while, and I’m convinced it has a chance to work. I had some trouble getting to the first round of voting because of website issues, so I missed voting on the fifteen finalists — which are now apparently subject to vote by a panel including Michael Moore, Gus Van Sant, Margaret Cho, Janeane Garofalo, and others — but we can all still vote on the funniest ad, best youth market ad, and best animated ad. Good stuff!